特朗普在最后几周宣布将在宾夕法尼亚州拿出“压箱底的竞选策略”，不再对外发动战争，并承诺即便未来与中国发生冲突，也会确保美国取得优势。其副手万斯也借此强化了自己的和平政策立场，称不会把美国人派往战场上“送死”。此外，他也强调自己会在竞选期间努力防止世界大战的发生，而非发动战争。最终，两人的言论反映了双方对于美国外交政策的不同观点。

：

The last few weeks have been marked by tensions between the United States and China, with both leaders issuing strong statements regarding their foreign policy stance. In particular, President Donald Trump has announced his plans to reduce military spending and even stop wars in the near future, while his vice president Mike Pence has taken a more cautious approach to diplomacy and stated that he will not send American troops to war.

On one hand, Trump's announcement of a "压箱底的竞选策略" has raised concerns about his commitment to traditional American values and security interests. His willingness to give up on costly military programs and prioritize domestic priorities such as healthcare and infrastructure could potentially lead to a shift away from the US's role as a global superpower.

On the other hand, Pence's vow to prevent world War II and ensure a US advantage in any conflict reflects his belief in peaceful solutions and the importance of diplomacy in resolving conflicts. He also highlights his own role as a leader who will take all necessary measures to avoid a catastrophic outcome for America and its allies.
Despite these differences, it is clear that both leaders share a vision of maintaining American leadership and security through strategic partnerships and diplomatic efforts. It remains to be seen how this will play out in the coming months and years, but one thing is certain: both leaders' speeches reflect the complexities of contemporary international relations and the ongoing debate over the role of the United States in the world.
In conclusion, the statements made by President Trump and Vice President Pence reflect different perspectives on the state of US foreign policy. While some may view Trump's decision to reduce military spending and cease wars as a major shift away from traditional military dominance, others see it as a necessary measure to protect domestic interests and promote peace. On the other hand, Pence's emphasis on diplomatic solutions and the importance of preventing World War II highlights his commitment to diplomacy and the importance of maintaining stability in the global community. As the political landscape continues to evolve, it is likely that these differing viewpoints will continue to shape the direction of American foreign policy.